House Woman and Forced Arranged Marriages

If you were placed before the fait-accompli of your “marriage” to a stranger, and your life depended on how well you complied with the arrangement, what would you do? Adorah Nworah tackles this question in her debut novel, House Woman, a contemporary thriller published in June 2023 by the Unnamed Press.

I came across House Woman while perusing a list of 2023 psychological thrillers—my favorite genre—and knew I had to devour it. The story is set in sun-splashed Sugar Land, a suburb of Houston where I now live. The topic of the novel—forced arranged marriage, a practice still occurring in many African immigrant communities—is politically incorrect to broach with outsiders. Publishing a whole novel on the subject is a boat-rocking feat! Bravo, Ms. Nworah!

Plot Summary

Ikemefuna, a young Nigerian woman, arrives in Texas from Lagos, head brimming with snapshots of the American Dream. She’ll inhale freedom in America, marry her handsome and rich attorney husband, Nna, live in a sprawling mansion, and open a dance studio.

At first, she lives with Nna’s parents (the Nwosus) in a Texan suburb, aiming to obtain their favor by being a dutiful future daughter-in-law. When Nna visits, she seeks to secure his love. But Ikemefuna soon realizes that gaining Nna’s affection won’t be enough: his parents, who won’t allow her out of their sight, clamor for a grandson with an insistence that grows every day.

As decades-long family secrets emerge, and the weight of the Nwosus’ demands presses upon Ikemefuna, she tries to convince her future husband, who increasingly likes her, to break away from his parents’ influence and protect her. Ultimately, she will have to decide whom to trust in her quest to survive.

Characters

The book begins with a chapter in Nna’s perspective wherein he meets Ikemefuna at this parents’ house for the first time and is intrigued by her physical beauty. After she introduces himself as his wife, he’s at first skeptical, but then goes along with the narrative, to his parents’ delight. Still, he continues to grapple with the meaning of having a “wife” he’s never met before and tries to woo Ikemefuna the traditional American way (by going on dates, buying her gifts, etc.). However, his parents thwart any attempt to take Ikemefuna beyond the family compound and declare Ikemefuna must give him a son to prove her marriageability. As the story progresses, Nna struggles between decency and the growing entitlement over Ikemefuna that his parents fuel. In the end, his choices will determine his and Ikemefuna’s fates.

Ikemefuna was hard to decipher and early in the story, bore some of the telltale signs of an unreliable narrator. She had blackouts during which she became violent (to the point of attempting to strangle Nna’s mother) and also held her share of secrets. In the first half of the book, it is hard to figure out whether a villain lurks within her, but her motivations become clearer as aspects of her past in Lagos are revealed.

Nna’s mother is a villainous character with an obsession for controlling the lives of those around her. She calls herself the chief priestess of a female god named Ala, one she invokes as rationale for the important decisions she imposes upon others. In several instances, she uses violence to force her will upon Ikemefuna. One of the things the author does well is expose the impotence of this god, which is merely the authoritarian mask Nna’s mother uses to manipulate others.

Nna’s father is a passive figure who carries out his wife’s orders and doesn’t exhibit any independent backbone.

Plot

The story begins with a sense of foreboding that ramps up after Ikemefuna has her first blackout episode and the lines between victim and villain blur. There are brief interludes during which Nna, who has taken to liking Ikemefuna, offers a glimmer of hope that he might redeem his and his parents’ actions and let Ikemefuna chart her own course (this thread does not resolve until the end of the story). As it becomes apparent that Ikemefuna is repulsed by Nna yet must continue the charade of a smitten betrothed to plan her escape, any semblance of a happily-ever-after shatters. The rest of the plot becomes a contest between Ikemefuna and the Nwosus for which side will emerge from the brick mansion alive.

I went into the story dreading the body horror elements that some of the early reviewers had mentioned. Although the violence demonstrated during various fights was often stomach-roiling, it was merely the consequence of telling a story about physical abuse. Also, I wondered whether the false god angle with Nna’s mother would take a supernatural turn (minor spoiler, to my relief, it didn’t). There were no graphic sex scenes. However, Ikemefuna’s disgust with Nna comes in the form of a recurrent description of Nna’s male body part, which caused me to scrunch up my face every time.

Writing

I enjoyed the author’s vivid descriptions and punchy use of verbs. I could feel Ikemefuna’s distress as the bare walls of her tiny bedroom closed down upon her and the bars on her window sealed an escape route. The reason for her blackouts was never explained which left me with an unsettled feeling throughout the book, which might have been the author’s intent.

The story went back and forth between present and past, and scenes set in Nigeria were interspersed among those in Texas. Some of the past revelations were unclear and I wondered long after I’d completed the book whether I’d misread sections of the story.

My Takeaway

This book is a new and bold take on the immigrant’s view of the American Dream. Here, the antagonists aren’t the usual challenges of integration into American society but rather the desires within oneself and the machinations of those within one’s own household and community. It’s an honest, non-PC, tale that needed to be recounted.

Posted in Book Reviews, Family, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Vanishing at Castle Moreau and “Fright With a Purpose”

In the late 90s, I watched a film based on H.G. Wells’ The Island of Doctor Moreau. At the time, I didn’t dwell much upon the movie’s main theme—man’s ever doomed attempts to use scientific advances to usurp God’s authority. Instead, what clung to my mind were the humanized beasts the mad Dr. Moreau had created. For weeks afterward, whenever I closed my eyes, my imagination painted nightmarish scenarios. To this day, I avoid most fiction with horror or paranormal elements, with one exception: Jaime Jo Wright’s stories.

 Jaime Jo Wright (who won a Christy Award for her debut novel!) writes spine-chilling novels with titles such as The Curse of Misty Wayfair, The Haunting at Bonaventure Circus, The Premonition at Withers Farm, and more. In her books, the big twists remain grounded in the physical realm no matter how otherworldly the plot seems. Also, her flawed and relatable protagonists usually overcome real-life social and emotional obstacles. When I crack open one of her novels, I’m certain that by the end of the hair-raising tale, I’ll have been treated to clever, rational sleight of hand and will have witnessed the triumph of characters who yielded to emotional growth and spiritual transformation.  

I grinned the first time I heard the title of Jaime Jo Wright’s most recent novel, The Vanishing at Castle Moreau. This was one Moreau-titled creative art that wouldn’t cause dark circles under my eyes.

Plot Summary:

The Vanishing at Castle Moreau is a dual-timeline suspense novel set in Wisconsin.

In 1870, orphan Daisy Francois is so desperate to escape her past that she accepts a maid position at the Castle Moreau, a place where women are known to disappear. Her employer, a reclusive authoress of horror novels, conceals many secrets, and might just pluck her published tales from real life. When another girl vanishes from Castle Moreau, Daisy must decide whether to flee to an uncertain fate or unfurl, at the risk of her sanity, the mysteries lurking inside the castle.

In the contemporary timeline, an emotionally broken Cleo Clemmons arrives at a dilapidated Castle Moreau. She’s been hired by the grandson of the castle’s current occupant to help clear his grandmother’s hoarded possessions. But as Cleo sorts through the accumulated piles of things, she unearths secrets that could revive the legend shrouding the old castle.

Interspersed between Daisy’s and Cleo’s POVs, are first-person narrations by “The Girl,” a young resident of the castle who’s regularly glimpsed a mysterious woman with a crooked hand.                        

Characters

Daisy and Cleo are well-drawn protagonists. While maintaining tension, Jaime Jo Wright progressively unpacks the women’s respective pasts to elicit the reader’s sympathy and provide a rationale for why they remained at Castle Moreau despite the eeriness surrounding the place. These heroines are daring, yet vulnerable and teachable.

Plot

Jaime Jo Wright usually structures her novels so that the historical and contemporary narratives parallel each other. This model was executed particularly well here. In the last act of the novel, the story moves swiftly between timelines, making it very hard to pause reading. Although I partially guessed the “how” for some of the pivotal elements in the story, the “why” completely surprised me. The big reveals had textured motivations (can’t reveal without spoiling) that left me satisfied.

Writing

As with all of Jaime Jo Wright’s novels, the rich prose complements the plot. Descriptions of the castle set up an ominous atmosphere. The emotional turmoil within the characters is well rendered, and touches of humor enliven the tale.  

My Takeaway

The Vanishing at Castle Moreau was another hit from Jamie Jo Wright. I continue to be a fan of her “fright with a purpose” writing.  She took a fear-driven legend and fashioned a story of hope and honorable family legacy.

Posted in Book Reviews, Faith, Family | Leave a comment

Only the Beautiful and the U.S. Eugenics Movement

This summer, I’ve enjoyed my longest streak of leisurely reading. Between postpartum brain fog and a house reverberating with the bustle of visiting relatives, writing was a non-starter. So, I dove into reading, free from any preoccupation about written word count.

Only the Beautiful by Susan Meissner was published on April 18, 2023, by Berkley. It’s a new release I’d been eager to read since hearing it dealt with eugenics. Stories that weave familial drama, controversial medical ethics, and a redemptive message are my catnip.

Plot Summary

Only the Beautiful is historical fiction with dual timelines and two main protagonists.

We meet our first protagonist, sixteen-year-old Roseanne (Rosie), in 1938, California. She has lost her parents and brother in an accident. The state places her under the guardianship of Celine and Truman Calvert, the owners of the vineyard where Rosie has lived her whole life as the vinedresser’s daughter. But Rosie has a secret, which her mother advised her to guard: she sees colors when she hears sounds. But loneliness and search for understanding cause Rosie to divulge her secret. When she becomes pregnant, Celine sends her to an institution for unwed mothers. There, Rosie nurtures the hope for a new beginning with her baby. Yet, it soon becomes obvious that the institution is more than a place for delivering out-of-wedlock babies.

Our second protagonist, Helen Calvert, is Truman’s sister. It is 1947, and Helen has recently returned to America after witnessing firsthand Adolf Hitler’s brutal pursuit of hereditary purity—especially with regard to “different children.” When Helen arrives at her brother’s peaceful vineyard after decades working in Europe, she is shocked to learn what really happened nine years earlier to the vinedresser’s daughter, a girl whom Helen had long ago befriended. In her determination to find Rosie, Helen discovers that while the war had been won in Europe, there are still terrifying battles to be fought at home.

Characters

Within the first few pages, it is easy to empathize with Rosie, an orphan with an uncertain future. Rosie endures a series of obstacles. At first she stumbles because of her naivete and innocence. Then, she learns and applies rules to protect herself and her child from the ruthlessness of the medical and social environments she inhabits. Part One ends with a question mark about Rosie’s fate, but her growth arc is evident.

Helen is a sober adult who’s been emotionally scarred by her experience in Austria during WWII. Her instinct to rescue vulnerable children is triggered when she glimpses in her country the same evil she previously confronted without success. Solving the enigma of what became of Rosie and her daughter is Helen’s opportunity to atone for the past. Wartime Helen—ideologically naïve—becomes a grounded Helen who attempts to defeat evil at home.

Ultimately, Helen’s and Rosie’s narratives entwine, leading to a cathartic ending.

Plot

The narrative was what I expected from a book dealing with cultural/societal evil. Eugenics, involuntary euthanasia, teenage pregnancy, exploitation of children, and adultery are themes that the story explores with varying depth. There was a happy ending (thank you!) and surprises along the way. While I guessed what would happen to Rosie at the institution, there was enough tension to carry the plot from one surprising detail to the next.

Writing

The voice was unobstructive (as I prefer in historical fiction) and let the plot shine.

Takeaway

The novel was an enjoyable read even if at times challenging because of its subject matter. It left me hungry for more information about the eugenics movement in the United States (as I relate below). The story also highlighted that it is easier to point out or confront evil that is foreign than the one that dwells closer to home or in our own hearts.

The American Eugenics Movement

Additional Information. Susan Meissner has said in an interview that Only the Beautiful was inspired by a 1927 Supreme Court case, Buck v. Bell, involving a young woman named Carrie Buck.

Carrie Buck and her mother. Carrie was at the center of Buck v. Bell, the Supreme Court case that legalized forced sterilization for eugenic purposes.

Carrie Buck, born in Virginia in 1906, lost her father very young. When Carrie was three, her mother was committed to the Virginia State Colony for Epileptics and Feeble Minded, and Carrie was placed with a foster family.  At seventeen, Carrie was raped by a nephew of her foster mother and became pregnant. Her pregnancy became evidence of her “feeblemindedness,” an amorphous label that the medical field applied to what it viewed as hereditary sexual promiscuity. Carrie gave birth to her daughter, and soon after, was like her mother committed to the Virginia State Colony for Epileptics and Feebleminded.

In 1924, Virginia had passed a law authorizing the sexual sterilization of institutional persons “afflicted with hereditary forms of insanity that are recurrent, idiocy, imbecility, feeble-mindedness or epilepsy”. Supporters of the law decided to test its constitutionality. They chose Buck because they believed that she had inherited her feeblemindedness from her mother and, that similarly, her daughter was showing signs of slow mental development. The case made its way to the Supreme Court, where in the majority opinion, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes stated that the “principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes.” He famously concluded that “three generations of imbeciles are enough.”

Buck v. Bell led to the forcible sterilization of almost 70,000 people in more than thirty U.S. states. The decision also had international reach. At Nuremberg, lawyers for the Nazi doctors claimed Buck v. Bell as U.S. precedent in their clients’ defense. Sadly, the public made no connection between U.S. laws and Nazi crimes and forced sterilization practices persisted until the late 1970s.

Although Buck v. Bell has never been expressly overturned, its reasoning has been discredited by subsequent case law.

Sources

Buck v. Bell. 274 U.S. 200 (1927). http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?q=Buck+v.+Bell.+274+U.S.+200+(1927).&hl=en&as_sdt=806&case=1700304772805702914&scilh=0 (Accessed August 2023).

Lombardo, Paul. Three Generations, No Imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. Bell. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008.

Antonios, Nathalie, Raup, Christina, “Buck v. Bell (1927)”. Embryo Project Encyclopedia (2012-01-01). ISSN: 1940-5030 http://embryo.asu.edu/handle/10776/2092.

Cohen, Adam. Imbeciles: The Supreme Court, American Eugenics, and the Sterilization of Carrie Buck. New York: Penguin Books, 2016.

Smith, J. & Dictionary of Virginia Biography. Carrie Buck (1906–1983). (2020, December 07). In Encyclopedia Virginia. https://encyclopediavirginia.org/entries/buck-carrie-1906-1983.

Posted in Current Events, Family, Health, Science and ethics | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Dark Side of CRISPR Technology (Re-Creating Humans Part 2)

What’s the procedure that promises to deliver babies unaffected by the genetic abnormalities of their parents? It’s called heritable genome editing (HE) or germline editing and uses “gene editing” technology.

Currently, the fastest, cheapest and most reliable technique to edit genes is the CRISPR-Cas9 system.

Think of CRISPR-Cas9 system as pair of molecular scissors that has been programmed to edit a specific portion of DNA. Cas9 is a protein that can cut double-stranded DNA. It is coupled with an RNA sequence programmed to find the DNA sequence to be edited. When that target DNA is found, Cas9 binds to the DNA and cuts it, which shuts off the targeted gene.

CRISPR

The ability to use CRISPR for gene editing has changed the way scientists approach the treatment of diseases caused by changes in a single gene. But it’s important to distinguish between two types of gene editing: somatic gene editing and heritable gene editing.

Somatic gene editing affects only certain cells in a person in a way that does not impact reproductive cells. For example, a 36-year-old patient, Victoria Gray, suffering from sickle cell disease has had cells drawn from her bone marrow. Those cells were treated using CRISPR and then infused back into the patient. These edited cells produced a protein that helped alleviate the symptoms of sickle cell and improved the patient’s quality of life. But these changes would not be passed down to any child she subsequently had.

Victoria Gray, who has sickle cell disease, volunteered for one of the most anticipated medical experiments in decades: the first attempt to use the gene-editing technique CRISPR to treat a genetic disorder in the United States.
Meredith Rizzo/NPR

In contrast, heritable genome editing (HGE) is the process by which human reproductive cells (sperm, egg cells) or embryos are “edited” with the goal to produce children. These changes in the genetic make-up of reproductive cells are passed down from generation to generation.

However, HGE carries safety risks and raises ethical questions, what some have called the “dark side of CRISPR”.  

From a safety standpoint, the editing can cause unintended changes, such as the loss of an entire chromosome or big portions of it, which can doom the life of any child born with such edits.

Also, the use of HGE elicits ethical questions about the value of human life. It can cut people with disabilities out of existence—at the embryonic stage—without the rest of humanity even noticing. Although society at large may view genetic “perfection” as an undeniable good, many people with disabilities (for example several in the hearing-impaired community) are very protective of their genetic differences. Each human is intrinsically worthy of life just as he or she is.

In addition, the future child who possesses edited genes will have a genome to which he or she has not consented. Even with technological refinements to minimize unintended gene edits, do parents have the right to decide the genetic make-up of their future children and grandchildren?

From a regulatory standpoint, who would decide which genes are worth keeping and which ones should be removed from the human pool? “Society at large”? Agencies like the FDA? Scientists? Doctors?

At the moment, HGE is illegal throughout the world. But this regulatory prohibition has not stopped a scientist from experimenting on embryos using CRISPR. Twin babies, Lulu and Nana, were born from that experiment.

More about Lulu and Nana next…

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Re-Creating Humans

This week, I’ll be micro-blogging about heritable gene editing, i.e. the process by which human reproductive cells (sperm, egg cells) or embryos are “edited” to produce children.

The primary question is this:

The story is familiar but with a twist.

Boy meets girl. They fall in love and get married.

Among their wedding gifts is a DNA ancestry kit. Out of curiosity, they submit their DNA samples. Results return with the information that they are each “carriers” for an autosomal recessive disorder. This means that although they do not have health problems, they each “carry” one copy of the abnormal gene. There’s a 50% chance that their children will also be “carriers” (the two middle babies in the below chart) and a 25% chance that they’ll have a child who carries both copies of the abnormal gene and suffers from the disease (purple baby in the below chart).

Autosomal Recessive Disorder

If you were in this couple, would you avail yourself of a procedure that promised to edit out the abnormality in your genes so all your potential children would be neither “carriers” nor sick?

More about the procedure tomorrow.

Posted in Faith, Family, Health, Legal Ethics, Science and ethics | Leave a comment

Let There Be Light

A couple of nights ago, Hero Boy came to our bedroom, sobbing. 

Earlier in the evening, electricity had gone on and off in the neighborhood. As a result, the circuit breaker had tripped in the middle of the night, interrupting the supply of power to the upstairs bedrooms. 

Hero Boy, who’d fallen asleep to the comforting glow of a night lamp, had awoken to obscurity. Rightfully terrified, he’d rushed to us.

My husband resolved the breaker issue and Hero Boy went back to sleep in his room.

That little nighttime episode was a reminder of how we are instinctively drawn to the light. It is comfort, it is clarity, it is a blessing.  

God himself said it after He spoke the light into existence. “And God saw the light, that it was good.” (Genesis 1:4)

Without light, creation would have remained shrouded in darkness (“darkness was upon the face of the deep.” Genesis 1:2)

Light is exactly as God intended it to be, even when we take it for granted. 

Sadly, there are somber times when we can’t just flip a switch and illuminate a room. Or push a button to release lifesaving warmth.

As parts of Florida are battered by hurricane Ian, let’s pray for those residents whose lives have been upended. Prayers that visible light and power will be promptly restored, that damage will be minimal, and that those stranded will be rescued. 

We can also help bring God’s light to affected communities by supporting organizations providing hurricane relief such as Samaritan’s Purse or Save the Children.

Likewise, as Europeans (and probably many U.S. families) brace themselves for a cold, dark winter, let’s pray for God’s protection.

Posted in Current Events, Faith, Family | Leave a comment

The Merry-Go-Round That Keeps You Awake

Person with repetitive thoughts

Picture this. You’re in bed. The thermostat is set to your desired comfort temperature. Your preferred source of white noise hums in the background. The bedsheets are crisp and clean. Yet, sleep eludes you. You try counting sheep, but they dance away, their hooves leaving fading imprints on the repetitive thought du jour.

If that scenario is the unfortunate blueprint for most of your nights, you’ve got company.

Repetitive Thinking*

Person caught in a cycle of repetitive thinking

Repetitive thinking is the process of thinking attentively, repetitively, or frequently about oneself and one’s environment. Two types of nighttime repetitive thinking are believed to play a role in insomnia: worry and rumination.

“But…it’s productivity, not worry!”

If like me, you consider yourself a Very Efficient PersonTM, you might be chafing at having nighttime planning or problem-solving labeled as “worry”. After all, you’re not wringing your hands; you’re making good use of time. There might be new responsibilities at work or an uncomfortable conversation to be had with a friend or relative. Writers, you might be working out the kinks of a certain difficult scene. Thus, planning or problem-solving, given your sleeping troubles, is merely being productive, right?

Worry is a coping strategy for planning or problem-solving that focuses the mind on future threats and uncertainties.

No. It is worry.

What about rumination?

Worry contemplates the future and rumination dredges up the past.

Rumination is a coping strategy that involves dwelling on the past to understand and, potentially, alleviate negative emotions. Do you replay the moment when you made a mistake during a workplace presentation? Do you analyze a prior communication and brainstorm more suitable words than the ones you offered? Most of us have done so.

Whether as worry or rumination, repetitive thinking is a whirlpool in which your preoccupations swirl without ending.

“Just Thinking” or Preparing to Outrun a Tiger?

The exact mechanisms by which nighttime repetitive thinking disturbs sleep are poorly understood. Even so, we now know some of the effects of nighttime repetitive thinking on the body (as opposed to the mind).

Evidence suggests that nighttime repetitive thinking places enough strain on the brain to prevent the automatic inhibition of wakefulness that occurs around sleep onset. So, thinking about that spreadsheet or to-do-list, since you can’t sleep, keeps your body alert, which is incompatible with sleep.

Nighttime repetitive thinking also increases the heart rate and leads to elevated evening levels of cortisol, a hormone that is mainly released at times of stress.

Therefore, through repetitive thinking, the body enters a state similar to the biological basis for the “fight or flight” response. You’re in bed, yet your body is bracing for an attack from an invisible tiger.

Interrupting the Vicious Cycle

Bird escaping from a cage

Clinical studies indicate that mindfulness-based techniques alleviate rumination and worry.

Mindfulness is defined as techniques for “maintaining a moment-by-moment awareness of our thoughts, feelings, bodily sensations, and surrounding environment, through a gentle, nurturing lens.”

Evidence indicates that aspects of repetitive thinking such as self-blame (rumination), and fear and uncertainty (worry) are ideal targets for mindfulness-based interventions, which emphasize non-judgment, acceptance, letting go, trust, non-striving, etc.

However, it is my belief that mindfulness separated from biblical truth is merely a tug of war between “positive thinking” and “negative thinking”. Eventually, one’s supply of “good vibes” will run dry.

God’s Promises

Opened Bible

God tells us in the Bible how to handle worry and rumination. Here are some examples:

Worry

Therefore, do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.” (Matthew 6: 34)

That spreadsheet, scene, or other burden that squats in your mind at nighttime can be dealt with the next day.

Further, this is what the prophet Jeremiah says about God’s faithfulness in Lamentations 3:22-24:

Because of the Lord’s great love, we are not consumed, for His compassions never fail.

They are new every morning; great is Your faithfulness.

I say to myself, “The Lord is my portion; therefore, I will wait for him.'”

Why strive on your own when you could receive a new provision of God’s mercies the next morning? Even if you don’t have a lightbulb moment that illuminates your problem or provides a new perspective, waking up with a refreshed rather than a battered mind is a mercy.

And on a pragmatic level (for my fellow Very Efficient PeopleTM), Jesus said it best by asking in Luke 12:25:

Who of you by worrying can add a single hour to your life?”

Ouch! Nighttime repetitive thinking has only left me with daytime misery, dark circles, and probably a shortened life expectancy.

We’re invited to cast our cares on the Lord (Psalm 55:22) and He will sustain us; to put our trust in Him when we’re afraid (Psalm 56:3); and to trust in Him with all our hearts and not lean on our own understanding (Proverbs 3:5-6).

Rumination

As to rumination, churning thoughts of self-condemnation is succumbing to the lie that you’re worthless, unforgivable, and forever stained by sin.

However, God’s Word gives us the truth. He forgives all of our sins (Psalm 103:3), redeems our lives from the pit, and crowns us with love and compassion (Psalm 103:4). He has removed our transgressions so far from us as the east is far from the west (Psalm 103:12).

Above all, Jesus Christ has already paid the price for the sins of those who have faith in Him.

God made Him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in Him we might become the righteousness of God.(2 Corinthians 5:21)

Self-condemnation attempts to diminish Christ’s atonement of our sins.

So, stop rewinding the tape and cling firmly to God’s promise that there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. (Romans 8:1)

I hope and pray you have a night of sleep devoid of repetitive thinking.

* There’s new evidence that in addition to rumination and worry, invading thoughts also play a role in sleep disturbance. Unlike repetitive thoughts, invading thoughts burst into the mind and trigger anxiety spikes.

Sources:

(1) Bible verses are from the New International Version. (2022). BibleGateway.com. http://www.biblegateway.com/versions/

(2) Pillai V, Drake C. 2015. Sleep and Repetitive Thought: The Role of Rumination and Worry in Sleep Disturbance. In: Babson K, Feldner M, editors. Sleep and Affect. Academic Press. p. 201-225.

(3) Lancee J, Eisma M, Van Zanten K, Topper M. 2017. When Thinking Impairs Sleep: Trait, Daytime and Nighttime Repetitive Thinking in Insomnia. Behavioral Sleep Med. 15(1): 53-69.

(4) Melo J, Campanini M, Souza S, Andrade S, González A, Jiménez-López E, Mesas A. 2021. Work-related rumination and worry at bedtime are associated with worse sleep indicators in school teachers: a study based on actigraphy and sleep diaries. Sleep Med. 80:113-117.

Posted in Faith, Health, Science and ethics | Leave a comment